AWR 201
Rough Draft Rubric
In the rough draft you should have your complete argument
present and well organized. This is not the time to worry about style, but to
work on the prosecution and structure of the argument. Your claims should be
bold, logically argued, and well supported by your sources. Keep your
paragraphs focused, with smooth transitions, and well integrated citations.
1500 word
3 good sources, MLA style
12 point, Times New Roman font
1” margins, name block, and page numbers
Argument __/50
Clear,
reasoned thesis __/10
Justified project “so what?” __/10
Reliability of sources __/10
Acknowledges multiple sides of
discussion __/10
Conclusion has a call to action
“what’s next?” __/10
Structure and Style __/50
Attractive introduction __/10
Quotations
well integrated __/10
Clear
conclusion __/10
Clarity of sentences __/10
Overall flow __/5
Organic transitions _/5
Total ___/100
Solution
Submitted
To:
Submitted
By:
Course
Code:
Date:
Internet Access
must be Limited to Students
In today’s business environment, internet access plays a
significant role. Internet access and revolutionary technology has changed the perspective of everything(French and Shim) . This argumentative
topic will highlight the importance of traditional learning methods instead of
internet things. The internet access and IT revolution should be limited for
the students. In this argumentative, I
will discuss that there should be limited access to the internet, especially to students. Especially, for teenagers, access to internet technology should
be limited and controversial.
Internet access and technology should be in limited access
for teenager’s students, or it should be
only monitored by the adult tutor.
People very well know
that internet access should use only when they need.
As we are living in such a modern area of
technology where the concept of internet access and technology revolution
cannot be denied. Young generation and adults do not have any option to except
the internet to gain knowledge and
relevant information. However, it is argued
that internet access should be limited for the students. There are some
arguments which strongly support this concept.
Internet access and technology should be in limited use
because through this way students stay away from illegal activities. For
examples, social hacking, criminal activities are common on the internet. Teenagers students and adults do not differentiate legal and illegal activities
in that age; therefore they did not know
what is actually right and what is wrong. Rapid revolutionary technology and
quick internet access have changed
everything and it snatches the innocence
of children(Thierer) .
To access different internet websites students especially,
teenagers involve in criminal and illegal activities.
Moreover, many people argue that there must be limited
access to the internet and too heavily restricted from seeing the political point
of view(Escobar, Dagnino and Alvarez) . In some regions,
free and cheap internet access make easy for all to use internet anytime
anywhere. Free and cheap internet access has increased the crime rate and
online illegal activities. People through different names and fake identities
made fool others through like Facebook, Whatsapp,
and Instagram and Twitter access.
Internet access and IT technology should be limited for the students
because it disconnects students from
social interactions and communities(Greenhow and Askari) . In today’s world, young people did not know the essence of social meetings and interactions.
However, social interaction and meetings are the best ways to gain knowledge
and information. Students do not involve
in outdoor games and planning through this way they have lack of knowledge.
Moreover, internet access also badly
affects the health of students. Continuously sitting for a long time in front
of screen affect their eyes as well as their minds.
Moreover, many people are sceptical
of technology, and it does not allow
students to verbally communicate with each other(Grint, Jones and Holt) . It kills the confidence and communication skills of the
students. At the same time internet access disconnect students from
collaboration and dynamic interaction among other people.
Especially for teenagers and students,
there should be limited access to the internet and technology because it fosters cheating and frauds. For example, for
research students, the digital use of the
internet makes easy for copying and
paste. However, it is illegal and sometimes considered as deceive behavior. Besides this, there are various
advantages of using limited access to the internet.
The limited use of internet access allows
students to focuses on studies and helps them to stay away from unethical practices(Bell, Bryman and Harley) .
On the other hand, people might think that internet access should not be limited to students as
there are few many things needed which only access through the internet and technology. One might think that unlimited internet access allows students to find relevant information
and related academic sources. Limited internet access helps students in the following areas,
One might argue that there must be limited access of
internet to students because it positively helps student’s to gain knowledge
and useful information regarding any topic. Moreover, it does not only provide
useful information regarding any time but provide it timely. Limited access to internet saves time and reduce creepy effort(Blitt and Brassler) . It can help students to get high grades instead of
wasting time on traditional learning modes.
Unlimited access to the
internet allows students and people to
transmit and share information from one side to another(Becker, Davis and Freeman) . It is the basic
characteristics of the improved social media communications
that one can share something to another in a quick way. The people can
share something with their fellows via
social communication. Moreover, this can be only possible when students will
have unlimited access to internet
facility and technology.
The unlimited use and access to
the internet and technology help students to connect socially and transmit
information. One might argue that social connected interactions give better
results than traditional interaction. People argue that through the online connection they better communicate with
each other anytime and anywhere. Because there is quick feedback get in online
communication and wider reach. No matter in
where the person lives, unlimited internet access allow wider reach and access
worldwide (Zuboff) .
The use of internet access should be limited to for students. Many
people argue that students do not allow
to use internet anytime. Internet access
should be limited for the student because
of many reasons. Through limited access to
internet and technology students stay away from illegal activities, frauds,
hacking activities as well as criminal activities(Cai, Du and Xin) . Moreover, limited
access to the internet allows users and students to mainly focus on studies and
their academic career. Similarly, here the role of elders and assistants play an important role. The elders
in a family must play a proactive role in stopping them from going astray. They
can specify a time period or precautions
to use the internet.
To conclude the paper, it is discussed that there should be
limited access to internet access to
students especially. Many people argue that there must be limited access to the internet
for students in order to increase their
efficiency and productivity. While many other
people who thought that the internet
should be unlimited argue that there must be unlimited access to the internet
and use of IT technology to get better results. Therefore, there must be limited access to the internet.
On the other hand, people might argue that people have unlimited access to the internet
to reach a wider range in order to
transmit information.
Work
Cited
Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., et al. " NMC
horizon report: 2017 higher education edition ." The New Media
Consortium. (n.d.): 1-60.
Bell, E., A. Bryman, and
B Harley. Business research methods. Oxford university press., 2018.
Blitt, R. and R Bressler.
" Experiencing Experiential Education: A Faculty-Student Perspective on
the University of Tennessee College of Law’s Adventure in Access to Justice
Author, 50 J. Marshall L. Rev. 11." The John Marshall Law Review,
50(1), (2016): 2.
Cai, T., et al.
"Characteristics of cybercrimes: evidence from Chinese judgment
documents. ." Police Practice and Research, 19(6), (2018):
582-595.
Escobar, A., E.
Dagnino and S. E Alvarez. " Introduction: The cultural and the political
in Latin American social movements." In Cultures of Politics/Politics
of Cultures. Routledge. (2018): 1-30.
French, A. M., and J.
P Shim. " The Digital Revolution: Internet of Things, 5G, and
Beyond." CAIS, 38, (2016): 40.
Greenhow, C. and E
Askari. "Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of
research in K-12 related education." Education and information
technologies, 22(2), (2017): 623-645.
Grint, K., et al.
"What is leadership." The Routledge companion to leadership, 3
(2016).
Rose, K., S.
Eldridge, and L Chapin. "The internet of things: An overview." The
Internet Society (ISOC), (2015): 1-50.
Thierer, A. Permissionless
innovation: The continuing case for comprehensive technological freedom.
Mercatus Center at George Mason University., 2016.
Social Contact